Commercial Catheter Platforms for Large Pulmonary Embolism
Device (Manufacturer) | Mechanism / Category | Access size (Fr) | FDA PE Indication | Key Pros | Key Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FlowTriever® (Inari Medical) | Large-bore mechanical aspiration & nitinol disks | 16 – 24 F | Yes | Removes bulk clot rapidly; often no lytics needed. Robust FLASH / FLAME data with low 30-day mortality and RV/LV improvement. | Very large sheath → bleeding / venotomy repair risk; blood loss (may need re-transfusion); limited reach into distal branches. |
Indigo® Lightning 12 (Penumbra) | Computer-assisted vacuum aspiration | 12 F | Yes | Smaller bore than FlowTriever; “Lightning” algorithm auto-stops suction when only blood detected → less blood loss; highly trackable catheter. | Requires 12 F venotomy; may need multiple passes; less real-world outcome data. |
AlphaVac™ F1885 (AngioDynamics) | Directional aspiration with steerable funnel | 18 F | Yes (2024) | Large funnel minimises clogging and limits blood loss; APEX-AV study showed marked RV/LV reduction. | Largest access of any PE device; limited post-market data; high capital cost. |
AngioJet™ ZelanteDVT (Boston Scientific) | Rheolytic jet thrombectomy | 8 F | Off-label | Widely available; can combine with “power-pulse” lytic; rapid debulking possible. | Black-box warning for bradyarrhythmia / hemolysis & AKI risk; off-label for PE; smaller lumen than other mechanical systems. |
EKOSonic™ (Boston Scientific) | Ultrasound-assisted CDT (US-CDT) | 5 – 6 F dual | Yes | Allows 50–70 % lower tPA dose vs standard CDT; RCTs (ULTIMA, SEATTLE II, OPTALYSE) show rapid RV recovery & low bleeding. | Requires 2–6 h thrombolytic infusion & ICU monitoring; no mechanical extraction for very large clot burden; higher disposable cost. |
BASHIR™ (Thrombolex) | Expandable basket pharmacomechanical CDT | 7 – 8 F | Yes | Basket re-establishes flow then bathes clot with low-dose lytic; smaller sheath; early BEC-PE / RESCUE data encouraging. | Lytic still required (bleeding risk); limited large-scale evidence; deployment learning curve. |
Cragg-McNamara™ (Medtronic) | Multi-side-hole infusion catheter (standard CDT) | 4 – 5 F | Off-label | Inexpensive; widely stocked; easy bilateral placement; minimal access size. | Requires 12–24 h lytic infusion → higher bleeding risk; passive lysis with slower RV recovery. |
Uni-Fuse® (AngioDynamics) | Pressure-response-outlet infusion catheter | 4 – 5 F | Off-label | Even drug dispersion; low cost; familiar workflow. | Same prolonged-infusion bleeding concerns; no mechanical component. |
Fountain® (Merit Medical) | Gradient-hole infusion catheter | 4 – 5 F | Off-label | Laser-drilled spiral holes give uniform dispersion (5–50 cm lengths); useful in distal branches or hybrid setups. | Needs prolonged lytic infusion; minimal data in massive clot; non-mechanical. |
¹ “FDA PE indication” refers to explicit 510(k) clearance naming pulmonary embolism. Devices marked “Off-label” are cleared for peripheral use but commonly employed in PE at operator discretion.
How to use this chart
- Match patient & clot profile — Large-bore thrombectomy (FlowTriever, AlphaVac, Lightning 12) excels when a big, central clot must come out fast and bleeding risk is high.
- Balance bleeding vs access risk — Ultrasound- or basket-assisted CDT (EKOS, Bashir) lowers tPA dose but still requires several hours and systemic anticoagulation; standard infusion catheters are simplest but use full-dose lytic.
- Mind the sheath size — A 24 F FlowTriever or 18 F AlphaVac may not be tolerated in small femoral veins or severe RV failure; 5 F infusion catheters can be placed via a single 12 F dual-lumen sheath for bilateral therapy.
- Confirm indications & experience — Some devices (e.g. AngioJet, standard infusion catheters) are widely used in PE but technically off-label; follow institutional policy and your PERT algorithm.
Situations Where Catheter-Based PE Devices Outperform
Systemic Thrombolysis or Anticoagulation Alone
Clinical scenario | Why device therapy is preferred | Why thrombolytics / heparin fall short |
---|---|---|
Absolute / major relative contraindication to systemic lysis • Recent intracranial hemorrhage or neurosurgery • Intracranial mass / AVM • Major non-CNS surgery or trauma < 2 weeks • Active or high-risk bleeding diathesis |
Mechanical or low-/no-lytic catheters debulk clot while avoiding systemic fibrinolytic exposure. | Systemic tPA forbidden or carries prohibitive ICH/GI-bleed risk; heparin alone cannot reverse shock or severe RV strain. |
Massive (high-risk) PE with impending or ongoing hemodynamic collapse | Large-bore aspiration/thrombectomy provides immediate after-load relief and can be performed rapidly in the cath or IR suite. | Systemic tPA may require 30–120 min for effect and can worsen hypotension once given; anticoagulation alone is too slow. |
Failure of systemic thrombolysis • Persistent shock / RV dysfunction ≥ 2 h after full-dose tPA |
Serves as rescue strategy—mechanically removes residual clot, often restoring MAP and oxygenation within minutes. | Repeat lysis markedly increases ICH risk; further observation with heparin alone risks cardiac arrest. |
Intermediate-high risk PE (RV/LV ≥ 1.0 plus elevated troponin) • Early clinical deterioration or escalating vasopressor/O2 needs • Moderate bleeding risk (e.g., age > 75, recent GI bleed) |
Randomized and registry data (PEERLESS, FLASH) show rapid RV recovery, less ICU utilization, and fewer clinical deteriorations versus catheter-directed thrombolysis or AC alone. | Full-dose systemic tPA not guideline-endorsed in this group (bleeding vs. benefit); anticoagulation alone may not prevent progression. |
Pregnancy / early postpartum with massive or intermediate-high risk PE | Mechanical thrombectomy or low-dose catheter lysis minimizes maternal & fetal hemorrhage risk while achieving reperfusion. | Systemic lytics carry up to 20 % maternal bleeding and fetal-loss risk; surgery poses greater anesthesia/uterine perfusion hazards; heparin alone insufficient when shock or severe RV strain present. |
Very large proximal (saddle/main) clot with severe RV strain or refractory hypoxemia, but bleeding risk high | Registry (FLASH) shows > 20 % drop in mPAP and rapid RV/LV ratio normalization without systemic lytics. | Systemic tPA dose needed to clear massive burden raises major bleed risk; anticoagulation alone rarely reverses RV failure fast enough. |
*Device therapy = mechanical thrombectomy, ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (US-CDT), or low-dose pharmacomechanical CDT, selected per institutional protocol and operator expertise.*
How to apply this table
- Risk-stratify first — Use ESC/AHA classification, RV imaging, and biomarkers to identify high- and intermediate-high–risk patients.
- Screen for bleeding risk — Absolute or major relative thrombolytic contraindications immediately tilt the scale toward mechanical or low-dose catheter therapies.
- Engage your PERT early — Rapid multidisciplinary decision-making speeds access to the cath/IR suite and mechanical circulatory support if needed.
- Match device to anatomy & urgency — Large-bore aspiration (FlowTriever, AlphaVac) for central clot and shock; US-CDT (EKOS) or basket-assisted (BASHIR) when partial lytic use is acceptable.
Key guideline / evidence anchors
ReplyDeleteAll major guidelines (ESC 2019, AHA 2021, PERT 2024) list catheter-directed interventions as rescue after lysis failure or when bleeding risk makes systemic thrombolysis unsafe
American College of Cardiology
Thrombolytic contraindications that push therapy toward devices (recent surgery/trauma, intracranial pathology, etc.) are detailed in critical-care references
EMCrit Project
IR embolectomy/mechanical thrombectomy is specifically recommended for massive PE with absolute lytic contraindication or after failed lysis
EMCrit Project
PEERLESS RCT and FLASH registry show faster recovery and lower ICU utilization with large-bore thrombectomy in intermediate-high–risk PE
American College of Cardiology
PMC
Case reports and reviews document successful catheter thrombectomy in pregnancy where systemic lysis is relatively contraindicated
PMC
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:f91adead-a159-48e9-abbb-bf26e82cd1bb
ReplyDeletehttps://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:a7d86cf5-0d49-4559-bf5b-d6369eed0049
ReplyDeleteAbove are the links to the ECS Guidelines (2022) and ACC Guidelines(2024)- copy and paste in browser
ReplyDelete