The paradox of reduced myocardial shortening in the
presence of preserved EF is explained mathematically
through geometric factors, where EF can be constant
for a large variation in shortening if other geometric
factors are altered to compensate. Increased wall
thickness and/or reduced ED volume augment EF,
and therefore can maintain a normal EF despite
reduced shortening. EF is quadratically dependent
on circumferential shortening and only linearly
dependent on longitudinal shortening; hence, EF is
less sensitive to a reduction in longitudinal shortening.
Our findings suggest that strain measurements reflect
systolic function better than EF in patients with
preserved EF.
Comparison Between Ejection Fraction and Strain
Editorial Comment V. Fuster MP4
The opinions expressed on this website are that of my own and do not reflect that of any employer or commercial organization.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
The following are key points to remember from this Expert Consensus Document on the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (M...
-
I will write more about this in the next blog, but the concept of driving pressure ( Pdr = Vt/Crs- Vt; tidal volume, Crs; compliance respir...
-
CV Medications in Pregnancy Table for Quick Review, I posted this article earlier in the year but not the Central Illustration Cardiova...
-
The following are key points to remember from this Expert Consensus Document on the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (M...
No comments:
Post a Comment